How FDIC’s GENIUS Act Plan Could Allow US Banks to Issue Stablecoins

Published 12/16/2025

How stablecoins-and-corporate-bitcoin-moves">FDIC’s GENIUS Act Plan Could Allow US Banks to Issue Stablecoins

The FDIC’s proposed GENIUS Act aims to allow federally insured banks to issue stablecoins backed by reserves held at the Federal Reserve or other liquid assets, integrating these digital tokens into the traditional banking system under federal oversight. This initiative marks a significant regulatory shift with potential implications for the stability of both the banking sector and the broader digital asset ecosystem.

What happened

The FDIC’s GENIUS Act (Growing Economy, National Investment, and U.S. Innovation with Stablecoins Act) is a legislative proposal designed to enable federally insured banks in the United States to issue stablecoins. According to publicly available sources, including Cointelegraph and The Wall Street Journal, the Act would require stablecoins issued by these banks to be fully backed by reserves held either at the Federal Reserve or in other secure, liquid assets. This backing is intended to reduce the risk of runs on stablecoins by ensuring full asset coverage.

The GENIUS Act proposes placing stablecoins under a regulatory framework jointly administered by the FDIC and the Federal Reserve. This represents a departure from the current regulatory environment, where stablecoins operate largely outside traditional banking supervision. The Act would provide a federal charter for bank-issued stablecoins, potentially reducing the regulatory fragmentation and uncertainty that non-bank stablecoin issuers currently face.

A notable feature of the proposal is the extension of FDIC deposit insurance to the reserves backing these stablecoins, which contrasts with the current treatment of stablecoins as unregulated digital assets without such protections. This change could increase consumer confidence in stablecoins issued by banks.

Independent analysis from the Brookings Institution suggests that integrating stablecoins into the insured banking system could reduce systemic risks linked to unregulated stablecoins. However, it also highlights potential new risks arising from the interaction between stablecoins and bank balance sheets, as well as implications for monetary policy. The Wall Street Journal similarly notes that this integration could increase trust and stability but may blur the lines between digital assets and traditional deposits.

Why this matters

The GENIUS Act represents a fundamental reshaping of the regulatory framework for stablecoins by positioning them within the existing banking system. By requiring full reserve backing and FDIC insurance, the Act aims to mitigate the liquidity and credit risks that have historically challenged stablecoins, particularly during periods of market stress.

This integration could enhance consumer protection by aligning stablecoins more closely with traditional bank deposits, potentially increasing their adoption and use as a payment mechanism. By providing a federal charter, the Act seeks to reduce regulatory uncertainty that has inhibited stablecoin issuers, which could lead to a more stable and transparent market.

At the same time, the proposal raises important structural questions. The blurring of lines between stablecoins and traditional bank deposits could affect bank liquidity management and the transmission of monetary policy. As stablecoins potentially become a more significant part of the payments system, their interaction with bank balance sheets and central bank controls could introduce new systemic risks.

Furthermore, the FDIC’s involvement in insuring stablecoin reserves marks a notable expansion of its traditional role, which may alter risk profiles within the banking sector. The impact on competition between banks and non-bank stablecoin issuers also remains an important consideration, as the Act’s federal charter could advantage banks in the stablecoin market.

What remains unclear

Despite these outlines, several key details about the GENIUS Act’s regulatory framework and risk management remain unspecified in public sources. It is not clear how the FDIC would manage insurance risk related to stablecoins, especially in scenarios of rapid redemption or systemic stress. The exact regulatory standards governing stablecoin reserve composition beyond the broad requirement for Federal Reserve or liquid asset backing have not been detailed.

It is also unknown whether stablecoins issued by banks would be treated identically to traditional deposits in terms of capital requirements and liquidity coverage ratios, or if distinct standards would apply. The implications for monetary policy transmission and central bank control, while acknowledged as significant, have not been concretely addressed or modeled.

Moreover, the effect of the GENIUS Act on competition between traditional banks and non-bank stablecoin issuers remains unexplored in available analyses. There is no empirical data on how bank-issued stablecoins would operate in practice, given that the Act is still a proposal and has not been enacted or implemented.

What to watch next

  • Official disclosures from the FDIC and Federal Reserve detailing the full regulatory framework and risk management protocols for bank-issued stablecoins.
  • Legislative progress of the GENIUS Act, including any amendments or debates that clarify reserve requirements, insurance coverage, and capital standards.
  • Public consultation or industry feedback on the impact of integrating stablecoins into the banking system, especially from non-bank stablecoin issuers and consumer groups.
  • Research or analysis on how stablecoin issuance by banks might affect monetary policy implementation and banking sector liquidity.
  • Developments in regulatory approaches to competition between bank and non-bank stablecoin issuers, including any moves toward harmonization or differentiation of regulatory treatment.

While the GENIUS Act proposes a clear framework for bringing stablecoins under federal banking oversight, significant questions remain about the practicalities of implementation and systemic impact. The balance between enhancing stability and introducing new risks to the banking system will require careful regulatory calibration and ongoing scrutiny.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/us-banks-issue-stablecoins-fdic-genius-act?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound. This article is based on verified research material available at the time of writing. Where information is limited or unavailable, this is stated explicitly.