How Bank of America Sees U.S. Banks Adopting On-Chain Technology

Published 12/15/2025

How Bank of America Sees U.S. Banks Adopting On-Chain Technology

How Bank of America Sees stablecoins">U.S. Banks Adopting On-Chain Technology

Bank of America projects a multi-year trajectory in which U.S. banks increasingly integrate on-chain technology—blockchain-based infrastructure—into core banking functions such as payments, settlements, and asset custody. This outlook coincides with evolving regulatory frameworks that are providing clearer guidance, encouraging traditional banks to explore blockchain solutions with greater confidence. Understanding this shift is essential as it may reshape operational transparency, efficiency, and competitive dynamics within the financial sector.

What happened

Bank of America (BoA) has released a research report forecasting that U.S. banks will progressively adopt on-chain technology to support various banking operations. The report identifies payments, settlements, and asset custody as primary areas where blockchain infrastructure could be implemented. BoA links this anticipated adoption to the maturation of regulatory frameworks, highlighting clearer guidance from agencies such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Federal Reserve as key enablers.

Specifically, the OCC’s approval of stablecoin payments by banks and the SEC’s recent statements on digital asset custody are cited as pivotal regulatory developments that reduce uncertainty for banks considering blockchain integration. This regulatory clarity is viewed as a catalyst encouraging banks to pilot or expand blockchain-based solutions.

Independent industry analyses from Deloitte and PwC corroborate BoA’s outlook. These reports confirm that several major U.S. banks are actively piloting blockchain applications, notably in payments and trade finance, reflecting a broader trend toward technological adoption consistent with BoA’s projections.

BoA and the referenced analyses interpret the move toward on-chain technology as motivated by both technological innovation and regulatory progress. The anticipated benefits include increased transparency of banking operations and reduced settlement times, which could improve operational efficiency. However, some analysts cited in the research also caution that blockchain adoption introduces risks such as cybersecurity vulnerabilities, challenges in interoperability, and ongoing regulatory compliance complexities.

Why this matters

The projected integration of on-chain technology into U.S. banks’ operations signals a potential structural shift in the financial system’s infrastructure. By embedding blockchain solutions into payments, settlements, and asset custody, banks could achieve greater operational transparency and efficiency, addressing long-standing challenges related to transaction speed and auditability.

From a regulatory perspective, the evolving guidance from key agencies like the SEC and OCC reflects a broader institutional acknowledgment of digital assets and blockchain as integral components of the future financial landscape. This regulatory evolution may lower barriers to entry for banks and encourage innovation while aiming to maintain oversight and consumer protections.

The competitive implications are also significant. According to Deloitte and PwC, early blockchain adopters among banks may realize cost reductions and improved customer experiences, potentially altering competitive dynamics within the sector. This could accelerate a technology-driven arms race among financial institutions seeking to leverage blockchain’s advantages.

Nonetheless, the introduction of blockchain technology into traditional banking raises important considerations around risk management, including cybersecurity threats and the need for robust interoperability standards. The transition also poses questions about how legacy banking systems will integrate with new blockchain infrastructure, affecting both operational continuity and systemic stability.

What remains unclear

Despite these insights, several critical questions remain unanswered by the available research. The extent to which smaller regional and community banks will adopt on-chain technology is not addressed, leaving unclear whether this trend will be sector-wide or concentrated among large institutions.

Regulatory frameworks governing on-chain banking activities are still under development, and the specific standards and rules that will ultimately apply remain uncertain. This regulatory ambiguity limits the ability to fully assess compliance risks and operational requirements for banks.

There is also a lack of detailed quantitative data on adoption rates, cost-benefit analyses, and comprehensive risk assessments associated with on-chain implementation. Information on how blockchain solutions will address privacy concerns and data protection within banking operations is notably absent.

Furthermore, the research does not explore how legacy banking systems will technically integrate with blockchain infrastructure or realistic timelines for such transitions. The potential impact of on-chain adoption on financial stability, particularly during periods of market stress or crisis, has not been empirically tested or analyzed.

Finally, international regulatory coordination and its influence on U.S. banks’ blockchain strategies remain unexplored, despite the inherently global nature of banking and digital asset markets.

What to watch next

  • Regulatory developments and formal rulemaking from the SEC, OCC, and Federal Reserve regarding blockchain and digital asset custody.
  • Public disclosures or pilot program announcements from U.S. banks detailing blockchain integration progress in payments, settlements, or asset custody.
  • Industry reports or surveys updating on adoption rates, cost-benefit analyses, or risk management practices related to on-chain banking technology.
  • Technical standards and interoperability frameworks emerging to support integration between legacy systems and blockchain infrastructure.
  • Research or regulatory assessments examining the impact of blockchain adoption on financial stability and systemic risk during volatile market conditions.

While Bank of America’s projection underscores a growing institutional embrace of blockchain technology within U.S. banking, significant uncertainties remain regarding adoption scope, regulatory frameworks, operational integration, and systemic implications. These open questions will shape how the sector evolves in the coming years and whether on-chain technology becomes a foundational element of traditional banking infrastructure.

Source: https://www.coindesk.com/policy/2025/12/15/bank-of-america-says-u-s-banks-are-heading-for-an-onchain-future. This article is based on verified research material available at the time of writing. Where information is limited or unavailable, this is stated explicitly.