Federal Reserve Revises Bank Policy, Eases Crypto-Focused Restrictions

Published 12/18/2025

Federal Reserve Revises Bank Policy, Eases Crypto-Focused Restrictions

Federal Reserve Revises Bank Policy, Eases Crypto-Focused Restrictions

The Federal Reserve has rolled back certain restrictions on banks’ engagement with crypto-related activities, particularly easing reserve requirements linked to stablecoin liabilities. This policy revision signals a shift from a cautious regulatory approach toward one that seeks to balance innovation with risk management in the digital asset sector.

What happened

In a significant policy update, the Federal Reserve removed previous guidance that had discouraged banks from providing services to crypto firms. This earlier guidance, introduced in 2023, had tightened capital and liquidity requirements for banks holding crypto-related assets, prompting several institutions to reduce their crypto exposures or exit crypto services altogether. The revised policy specifically eases constraints on banks’ ability to hold reserves against stablecoin-related liabilities, thereby lowering the regulatory barriers for banks to offer custody and transaction services to digital asset businesses.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell publicly framed the policy change as an effort to “balance innovation and risk,” suggesting a more open posture toward banks’ involvement with crypto activities, albeit with caution. The Fed’s official statement, as reported, confirms the rollback of the prior restrictive guidance, aiming to recalibrate risk management expectations for banks resuming or expanding crypto-related services.

This policy shift contrasts with the prior stance in 2023, when increased capital and liquidity requirements led to a noticeable pullback from crypto markets by some banks. While the Fed has not released detailed quantitative data on the impact of either the earlier restrictions or the recent rollback, the change is widely interpreted as a response to evolving market conditions and a maturing crypto ecosystem.

Why this matters

The Federal Reserve’s revised policy has structural implications for the banking sector’s role in the digital asset economy. By easing reserve requirements and relaxing risk management expectations, the Fed effectively lowers regulatory hurdles that had constrained banks’ willingness to engage with crypto firms. This may facilitate greater market access for digital asset businesses, potentially fostering innovation in financial products and services tied to blockchain technology and stablecoins.

Analysts interpret this rollback as a sign of growing institutional confidence in the crypto ecosystem’s stability and the improved risk controls developed by both banks and crypto firms. From a broader policy perspective, the Fed’s approach reflects a recalibration from a defensive posture aimed at curbing perceived financial risks toward one that acknowledges the importance of innovation while maintaining prudential oversight.

However, the easing of restrictions also raises concerns among financial stability experts who caution that re-engagement with crypto activities could reintroduce risks related to liquidity and reserve adequacy if supervisory frameworks are not sufficiently robust. The balance between encouraging innovation and safeguarding financial stability remains a central tension in the evolving regulatory landscape.

What remains unclear

Despite the confirmed rollback, several important questions about the policy’s implementation and impact remain unanswered. The Federal Reserve has not publicly detailed how it will monitor and enforce risk management practices among banks re-entering the crypto space under the eased rules. The supervisory frameworks and specific metrics the Fed will use to assess financial stability and innovation outcomes post-policy change have not been disclosed.

It is also unclear how the policy will affect different segments of the banking industry, such as smaller versus larger banks, in terms of their ability or willingness to participate in crypto-related activities. Furthermore, the extent to which other regulatory agencies—including the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)—will align their approaches with the Fed’s rollback remains unspecified.

Additional gaps include the lack of comprehensive data on how individual banks have adjusted their crypto business lines in response to the policy change and the absence of disclosures regarding consumer protection and anti-money laundering compliance in the context of crypto banking.

What to watch next

  • Federal Reserve announcements or guidance clarifying supervisory frameworks and risk management expectations for banks engaging with crypto firms under the eased policy.
  • Disclosure of specific metrics or indicators the Fed will use to evaluate the impact of the policy change on financial stability and innovation.
  • Reports or data on how banks of varying sizes adjust their crypto-related services and exposures following the rollback.
  • Statements or regulatory actions from other agencies such as the OCC, FDIC, and SEC indicating alignment or divergence in crypto banking oversight.
  • Market developments reflecting banks’ renewed participation in crypto custody, transaction services, or stablecoin-related activities as a result of the eased restrictions.

The Federal Reserve’s rollback of crypto-focused bank restrictions marks a notable shift in regulatory approach, balancing innovation with prudential concerns. However, key details about supervision, impact measurement, and inter-agency coordination remain unresolved. Observers will need to track forthcoming regulatory clarifications and market responses to assess how this policy change shapes the evolving interface between traditional banking and digital assets.

Source: https://decrypt.co/352834/fed-overhauls-bank-policy-pulls-back-from-prior-crypto-focused-restrictions. This article is based on verified research material available at the time of writing. Where information is limited or unavailable, this is stated explicitly.