BitMEX’s Arthur Hayes Says Altcoin Season Never Ended — Traders Missed the Winners

Published 12/20/2025

BitMEX’s Arthur Hayes Says Altcoin Season Never Ended — Traders Missed the Winners

BitMEX’s Arthur Hayes Says Altcoin Season Never Ended — Traders Missed the Winners

Arthur Hayes, co-founder of BitMEX, recently challenged the prevailing market narrative by asserting that altcoin season has not ended but rather continued quietly, with many traders overlooking the actual winners. This perspective invites a reassessment of how altcoin performance is tracked and understood amid a diversifying cryptocurrency market landscape in 2024.

What happened

In an April 2024 interview with Cointelegraph, Arthur Hayes stated that the notion of a discrete "altcoin season," traditionally seen as a distinct phase when altcoins outperform Bitcoin, is misleading. He argued that altcoin season “never ended,” suggesting instead that altcoin outperformance has been ongoing but fragmented across a broad range of tokens. Hayes emphasized that traders have often missed these winners because of a focus on headline assets like Bitcoin.

This view contrasts with the conventional market timing narrative, which typically identifies altcoin season as a specific period following Bitcoin rallies or corrections, characterized by a drop in Bitcoin’s market dominance and concentrated gains in a handful of major altcoins. Metrics such as the Bitcoin Dominance Index and comparative price performance between Bitcoin and selected altcoins are commonly used to signal these phases.

Data from crypto analytics platforms Messari and CoinGecko covering Q1 and Q2 of 2024 confirm that multiple altcoins outperformed Bitcoin in percentage gains during this period. However, these gains were dispersed across many projects rather than concentrated in a few well-known tokens, supporting Hayes’s assertion of a more fragmented altcoin landscape.

Market commentators and independent research reports have noted that traditional metrics like the Bitcoin Dominance Index may not fully capture this nuanced performance. Aggregated indices can dilute signals from emerging or niche altcoins, obscuring pockets of strong growth within specific sectors such as decentralized finance (DeFi), gaming, or layer-2 scaling solutions.

Why this matters

Hayes’s assertion challenges the established framework for understanding altcoin market cycles, suggesting that the binary view of altcoin season as an on/off phenomenon is outdated. If altcoin outperformance is indeed continuous but dispersed, traders and analysts may need to adopt more granular and sector-specific approaches to market analysis.

This shift has structural implications for how market participants evaluate risk and opportunity in crypto markets. The proliferation of new tokens and increased market maturity mean that performance is less about a few headline altcoins and more about identifying diverse winners across multiple niches. This diversification may also reflect evolving investor preferences and the broader adoption of blockchain technologies.

From a market structure perspective, reliance on broad metrics like Bitcoin Dominance could lead to missed signals and misinterpretation of market dynamics. More detailed analytics, including on-chain activity measures such as transaction volumes, active addresses, and liquidity flows, could provide better insights into emerging trends. These indicators may be essential for understanding the sustainability of altcoin gains and the underlying health of specific crypto sectors.

What remains unclear

Despite Hayes’s argument and supporting fragmented performance data, several key questions remain unanswered. There is no detailed quantitative analysis or backtested model publicly available from Hayes or BitMEX to substantiate the claim of a continuous altcoin season. The extent to which macroeconomic factors and Bitcoin price movements influence this ongoing altcoin outperformance is also not analyzed in the available sources.

Furthermore, it remains unclear which specific metrics or combinations thereof could reliably identify emerging altcoin winners before they gain broader market recognition. Current traditional indicators appear insufficient, but no consensus exists on improved measures beyond standard market capitalization and price data.

The impact of market fragmentation and the rapid proliferation of new tokens on the visibility and durability of altcoin gains is another open question. Additionally, the role of structural changes in the crypto ecosystem—such as increased institutional participation or evolving regulatory environments—in supporting or contradicting the continuous altcoin season hypothesis is not addressed in the current research.

What to watch next

  • Development and adoption of more granular, sector-specific performance metrics, including DeFi, gaming, and layer-2 solutions analytics.
  • On-chain activity data trends, such as transaction volumes and active addresses, as potential leading indicators of emerging altcoin strength.
  • Further empirical research or quantitative models from market participants or independent analysts testing the continuous altcoin season hypothesis.
  • Macro and Bitcoin price movement correlations to altcoin performance to better understand market interdependencies.
  • Regulatory developments and institutional involvement that could influence market structure and token performance dispersion.

Arthur Hayes’s perspective invites a reevaluation of how altcoin performance is conceptualized and measured. While fragmented altcoin gains are evident, the lack of robust data and comprehensive analysis limits definitive conclusions. Ongoing research and improved analytics will be critical to understanding whether altcoin season is indeed continuous or if traditional cyclical narratives remain relevant.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/altcoin-season-never-ended-traders-just-missed-the-winners-hayes?utm_source=rss_feed&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=rss_partner_inbound. This article is based on verified research material available at the time of writing. Where information is limited or unavailable, this is stated explicitly.